HomeSpiritual GrowthBible LiteracyLeviticus 11:20-23 Insects that walk on four legs?

Comments

Leviticus 11:20-23 Insects that walk on four legs? — 3 Comments

  1. For your apologetics you shouldn’t just make up “facts”. Try observing actual grasshopper like things (or watch them on YouTube). They very often walk moving (not dragging) their hind legs.

    But your whole argument (about grasshopper locomotion) is irrelevant. Leviticus is talking about all bug-like things (arthropods) and says they all have 4 legs (and seems unaware than some don’t fly). It also says that they are an abomination (שֶׁקֶץ), and people who contact them will become unclean and need to wash their clothes.

    My guess is that the ancient Jews had a bug taboo and avoided them and wouldn’t think of picking one up and counting its legs.

    This taboo caused ignorance about bug legs which is directly displayed in the parts of Leviticus proclaiming them abominable.

    • Who is making up facts? Perhaps “dragging” was a poor choice of words, but the hind legs are definitely not used in the same way as the other four which do the work of creeping as opposed to jumping. I have watched many grasshoppers and know the way the back legs are carried along rather lamely while walking. They are not weight bearing legs except when they are jumping. Furthermore, this was brought to my attention in a science class.

      I also beg you to re-read the passage. It would be nice if we could read and understand it in the original language without using the translations we have available. I don’t see anything that says they “all” have four legs as many biased scientist prefer to believe. Moses is simply using the terminology of his day to describe specific flying creatures in order to distinguish them from the rest. Moses might not have been taught to classify six-legged creatures as insects, but he knew how to describe the flying creatures he was writing about.

      As far as having a bug taboo, Moses was separating the ones that were OK to eat from the ones that were not OK to eat. Again, you should re-read the passage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>